Why do I have about 2hrs:30minutes Simulation time? Is there something I can do to improve this time? Or is it dependant on your end? |
by dchester
April 30, 2012 |
Have you asked for a long simulation time (Ts) with a timestep of Ts/10k or smaller? That extends the actual simulation time. Or is your circuit oscillating? Or is it struggling to find the initial conditions? Publicise your circuit then we can have a look and may be able to offer some more helpful advice. :) |
by signality
April 30, 2012 |
What I usually do is choose a short simulation time, like 3 cycles of the lowest frequency I expect to see, then choose a time step of 1/100 to 1/1000 of that. That usually gives adequate results for a first look-see. |
by arduinohacker
April 30, 2012 |
Sorry for the long response been busy with other work. But Its a simple RC Filter: https://www.circuitlab.com/circuit/44m6hv/filter/, I was doing a time sweep simulation varying the frequency. With the stop time 5 seconds and a step of about 0.001, then the frequency was 1 to 10000 decade with a step of 100 per decade. I tried it in safari and chrome on my macbook pro. |
by dchester
April 30, 2012 |
Looks like the forum picked up the comma trailing your URL as part of the URL. In any case, when I open your simple RC highpass circuit: and run a time domain simulation for stop time "10m", time step "10u", it completes in 0.44 seconds. When I do a frequency domain simulation, 1 to 1e8 Hz, 100 pts/decade, it completes in 0.28 seconds. Both numbers are on my laptop / Chrome / Linux. Using a simulation timestep of 0.001 (1 millisecond) with a 1kHz function generator would be inadvisable -- the simulator will be sampling the function at its fundamental period. |
by mrobbins
April 30, 2012 |
Please sign in or create an account to comment.
CircuitLab is an in-browser schematic capture and circuit simulation software tool to help you rapidly design and analyze analog and digital electronics systems.