Hi, I'm designing part of a circuit to detect dawn/dusk with a built-in ~10 minute delay which will serve as an input to some CMOS logic. It's the first such circuit I've designed and though it seems to behave correctly in CircuitLab I have a couple of questions:
Thank you! Tim |
by Tim
July 16, 2012 |
1) Depends on the real device you choose. CMP1 and CMP2 in your simulation are modified CL opamps which have rail to rail push-pull outputs rather than dedicated comparator models. You can choose real comparators that have push-pull or open collector/drain outputs. Push-pull outputs don't need a pullup. Open collector/drain outputs do. 2) 10 minutes is a long time for an RC circuit but is possible. Avoid large R/small C because the circuit will be more susceptible to leakage due to moisture cause by condensation than will small R large C. Timing with an RC may be a bit variable with component tolerances, temperature and ageing. A digital solution using a higher frequency clock oscillator and a divider chain may give you a more repeatable time but if the oscillator itself is an RC part then most of the same problems can occur. If you can find a source of them, then the old 4060 14-bit (รท16,384) ripple counter with internal oscillator is a nice solution: 3) If you keep the RC solution, you would be well adivised to add a small amount of hysteresis from CMP1 output to CMP1 non-inverting input. This will stop the output of CMP1 jittering at the threshold. Note to model an open collector comparator, you can use a voltage controlled switch like this: If you set the hysteresis to 0 then you can add your own hysteresis by putting a resistor from the out to the + input together with some source resistance at the + input. To make the hysteresis more predictable, you may want to add some series R between the junction of LDR and R2 and the + input to swamp the variation in Thevenin source resistance due to the variation in the resistance of LDR |
by signality
July 17, 2012 |
Another way to make a behavioural open collector/drain comparator: |
by signality
July 17, 2012 |
Hi, thanks for the replies: 1) I'm planning on using the LM393N, which is a dedicated comparator and is open-collector (I think). So pull-up resistor it is. 2) What counts as big/small? Would changing to 100k Ohms + 3300 uF be more appropriate? The timing and variance of the delay isn't that important. It's only there to have the output based on a sort-of running average of the last 5-10 minutes to avoid false triggers such as if a cloud passes in front of the moon for a few minutes. If this was done digitally wouldn't it still require significantly smoothing the input or doing something else to avoid the false triggers, rather than just having a delay? 3) Ok. I tried modelling the comparators with voltage-controlled switches but I believe + and - are connected and when the current reverses at CMP2 strange things happen - the capacitor doesn't like it. In the LM393N I think they're both connected to ground instead and so this shouldn't be an issue? Thanks for the help - this is very useful! |
by Tim
July 17, 2012 |
Please sign in or create an account to comment.
CircuitLab is an in-browser schematic capture and circuit simulation software tool to help you rapidly design and analyze analog and digital electronics systems.